Skip navigation

 Login or Register | Member Centre

Aging boomers spell trouble


Demographics sure are depressing from the perspective of North American investors and home owners. Michael Shedlock, author of Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis blog, doesn't attempt to sugarcoat the issue either, especially as it pertains to house prices: An aging population could create a glut of sellers, sending prices down.

“Boomers hoping to cash out on their homes, are two years or more too late in most places. Four years from now they will be six years too late,” Mr. Shedlock said in his posting, which addresses Canada and the United States.

“To support consumption at the current pace, boomers will have to start cashing out their IRAs and stock portfolios. They will also be looking to downsize autos and homes. When it comes to the latter, who are the buyers? What about the increasing tax burdens placed on the working force to support retirees? That backlash will be starting soon.”

He noted that the demographic time bomb has been ticking for years, though nothing was done to defuse the issue, and now it is too late to do anything about it.

No, this is not uplifting reading. But if you're looking for an upside, you can easily conclude that you should move your money to younger nations, like India, where demographics are in their favour.

 

  1. Lorne Goldman from Labelle, Canada writes: Mr. Berman,

    Please spend just a bit of time on research rather than adopting unresearched bombast.

    The boomers (1946-1960) are the richest generation in history. The multiples on their homes alone are staggering and the retirement plans look even better. More importantly, they refuse, unlike their parents, to die young or deny their skills and experience or fabulous capital to the economy after "freedom 55" (or 65 or 75 for that matter).

    The basic premise you stole is false. Look at the real stats and ask yourself why a pensioned, well-heeled retiree on a national health plan, suddenly freed of mortgage and their childrens' university and setup costs, making an unnecessary substantial part time income, need to sell the family homestead in a down market?

    Why, in an environment of a rising population, commodity and construction costs, do you feel that property costs in Canada must fall?! The great thing about old asset-heavy retired people is that will always be more of them than now.

    L.

Join the Conversation, Leave a Comment

This conversation is semi-moderated What is moderation? | How do I report a comment?

You must be logged-in to submit a comment — login now!

Not registered with globeandmail.com? Register now. It is quick and free.

close

Alert us about this comment

Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.

Back to Market Blog

Market Blog

Market intelligence throughout the trading day

Blogroll

Latest Blog Posts

Blogolitics 
Then And Now: GST Cut Good, GST Cut Bad
Globe on Baseball 
MacLeod: Wells Is No Doubting Thomas
Market Blog 
The close: The Big Four deliver
Number Cruncher 
Olympic euphoria extends to one lonely fund
From Deep  
Newspapers 101
Adam Radwanski 
New Democrats love them their free markets
Streetwise 
Gluskin Sheff deepens team, plans succession
Theatre 
Summerworks: A playwright pillow fight
The Office 
How to bring Feng Shui into the office
Kapica's Cyberia 
How to print money in broadcasting

Back to top