Skip navigation

 Login or Register | Member Centre

On further review...

Perhaps Dwight Duncan gave Stephane Dion a gentle nudge in the direction of the bus, or at least tried to pull him back after starting to throw him under it.

The transcript of the exchange that I referred to yesterday...

Q: TD is calling for a carbon tax. Are you still saying no to a carbon tax, especially given the cool reception it's been given on the federal scene?

DD: We have focused on cap and trade. And, one of the things that I think would be a mistake right now is massive shifts in tax burden at a time when there is uncertainty. So, we're going to continue to focus on cap and trade, along with a number of other initiatives the government has talked about, on climate change, recognizing that the commitment to carbon reduction is extremely important. I would point out - what's significant about Mr. Drummond's recommendation - is that you simply can't just cut corporate taxes and not find replacement revenue. It's kind of - to suggest that you just cut taxes and that magically things will recover I think TD pretty well slaps that down. What we need is a balanced approach to public policy. We think we've got the right balance and we think that the policies that we've laid out will help Ontario get through these challenging times.

Q: You said now - a time of uncertainty - is not the time for a massive shift in how you collect taxes. I think that's going to be a quote from the Conservative war room very shortly. Does that mean Mr. Dion's promise, in the Green Shift?

DD: No. The federal circumstances are, you know, listen, all the parties are now advocating fairly dramatic shifts. And so, from where we're at right now, I'm looking at our books, I'm looking at the provincial economy, and at this point in time, my view is that prudence on the revenue and expenditure side is the order of the day.

  1. Michael B from Canada writes: This is exactly the point I've been making since this blew up. He was referring to provincial taxes, not federal. And he said right now, he didn't say in general. He wasn't slamming Dion, and the media should be ashamed of how loudly they proclaimed that Ontario's Finance Minister was "sharply critical" of Dion, a phraseing that I find disingenous at best.

Join the Conversation, Leave a Comment

This conversation is semi-moderated What is moderation? | How do I report a comment?

You must be logged-in to submit a comment — login now!

Not registered with globeandmail.com? Register now. It is quick and free.

close

Alert us about this comment

Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.

Back to Adam Radwanski

Back to Globe Politics

Adam Radwanski

Adam Radwanski is a member of The Globe and Mail's editorial board. He blogs on all matters political, with commentary and analysis of what's making news (and what should be making news).

Blogroll

Latest Blog Posts

Go Figure 
Virtue no longer hitting the Wall
Market Blog 
Investors shrug off retailers' woes
Ingram 2.0 
Apple still has a credibility problem
Nobody's Business 
The shoe's now on the other foot
Number Cruncher 
Gibson holding steady with Focus 15
Restaurant Diary 
Dine and dash
Silver-Powers 
The Dirty Dance
Andrew Steele 
Shuffling the deck
Streetwise 
Peters lands Blackmont energy banker
Blogolitics 
Your Tax Dollars At Work

Back to top