Skip navigation

 Login or Register | Member Centre

Casting doubt on high-yielding stocks

WHAT ARE WE LOOKING FOR?

Stocks with a high yield, which could indicate a dividend cut is on the horizon.

MORE ON YIELD

Yield is calculated by taking the amount of dividends paid per share over the course of a year and dividing that by the stock's current price. Yields increase as share prices fall, so high yields can be a sign that investors are down on a stock. A yield higher than 7 per cent is often seen as a signal that investors are nervous about a potential dividend cut.

“When yields are above that mark, then it's usually time to start wondering what's going on,” said Joel Neynens, vice-president of Halifax-based Gordon Stirrett & Associates. “At that point, you want to be very cautious and make sure you are buying a good company and that the yield is sustainable.”

TODAY'S SCREEN

We screened the S&P/TSX to find companies (excluding income trusts) with a yield higher than 5 per cent. We also added price-to-earnings and price-to-book value ratios. There are some cheap stocks in this list, but you need to do more research to see if dividends are sustainable.

WHAT WE FOUND

On average, share prices of the dividend-paying companies are down 38 per cent on the year. Biovail Corp., which tops the list with a yield of 17 per cent, recently reassured investors that it had enough free cash flow to sustain the payouts, but warned it would cut the dividend if it needed money to fund an acquisition. The dividend on the next highest-yielding stock – Teck Cominco Ltd. – also looks increasingly in doubt as the company will likely need every penny it can earn to service the almost $10-billion in debt it took on to finance its takeover of Fording Canadian Coal Trust.



Start the Conversation, Leave a Comment

This conversation is semi-moderated What is moderation? | How do I report a comment?

You must be logged-in to submit a comment — login now!

Not registered with globeandmail.com? Register now. It is quick and free.

close

Alert us about this comment

Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.

Back to Number Cruncher

Number Cruncher

An investment column about screening for stocks and funds.

Blogroll

Latest Blog Posts

Market Blog 
U.S. job losses mounting
Nobody's Business 
The shoe's now on the other foot
Number Cruncher 
Who are the dogs of the Dow now ?
Silver-Powers 
Correction accepted
Andrew Steele 
Thrashing in the tar pond
Streetwise 
Thomas Weisel picks up a trio of veterans
Theatre 
Feast of Berlin: Hannah Moscovitch's play worth a second look
From Deep  
Bargnani's time is now
Adam Radwanski 
Warning: unappetizing mental image ahead
Adhocracy 
And now, naked sheep

Back to top